VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
05.03.202403.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Management of research activity in the region"

Automated System for Accounting Intellectual Activity Results as a Tool of Complex Accounting the Organization’s Research Activity Results (the Case of ASA IAR VolRC RAS)

Kabakova E.A.

4 (49), 2019

Kabakova E.A. Automated System for Accounting Intellectual Activity Results as a Tool of Complex Accounting the Organization’s Research Activity Results (the Case of ASA IAR VolRC RAS) . Territorial development issues, 2019, no. 4 (49). URL: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/28303?_lang=en DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.4.49.7

DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.4.49.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Seliverstova O.F. Podhody k ponyatiyam produktivnosti, rezultativnosti i effektivnosti v sfere nauchnyh issledovaniy i razrabotok // FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya. 2015. T. 8. № 4. S. 3–9.
  2. Varshavskiy A. Problemy nauki i ee rezultativnost // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2011. № 1. S. 151–157.
  3. Abramo G., DAngelo C.A. How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 2014, no. 101 (2), pp. 1129–1144. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
  4. Abramo Dzh. Bibliometricheskaya ocenka rezultativnosti nauchno-issledovatelskoy raboty: k chemu my prishli? // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2017. № 1. S. 112–127.
  5. Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A. Measuring Science: Irresistible Temptations, Easy Shortcuts and Dangerous Consequences. Current Science, 2007, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 762–766.
  6. Abramo G., Cicero T., DAngelo C.A. Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, no. 7 (2), pp. 528–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.013
  7. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 2015, vol. 102, no. 46, pp. 16569–16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  8. Sarli C.C., Carpenter C.R. An overview of measuring academic productivity and changing definitions of scientific impact. Missouri Medicine, 2014, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 399–403.
  9. Bornmann L. Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements. Higher Education, 2017, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 775–787. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-9995-x
  10. Litvinova L.I. Faktory nauchnoy produktivnosti i problemy ee ocenki // Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2018. T. 22. № 1. S. 61–75.
  11. Sharabchiev Yu. Produktivnost uchenyh: instrumenty ocenki // Nauka i innovacii. 2013. № 1 (119). S. 4–8.
  12. Alperin B.L., Vedyagin A.A., Zibareva I.V. SciAct – informacionno-analiticheskaya sistema Instituta kataliza SO RAN dlya monitoringa i stimulirovaniya nauchnoy deyatelnosti // Tr. GPNTB SO RAN. 2015. № 9. S. 95–102.
  13. Gavrilin N.P. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema upravleniya intellektualnoy sobstvennostyu // Ocenka investiciy. 2018. № 1 (9). S. 47–57.
  14. Parinov S. Koncepciya virtualnoy nauchnoy sredy «Otkrytaya Nauka» // Nauchnyy servis v seti Internet: superkompyuternye centry i zadachi: Tr. Mezhdunar. superkomp. konf., 20–25 sent. 2010 g. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2010. S. 473–480. URL: http://agora.guru.ru/abrau2010/pdf/473.pdf (data obrascheniya 05.04.2019).
  15. Stolyarov R.A., Chugreev V.L. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema ucheta rezultatov intellektualnoy deyatelnosti v nauchnoy organizacii // Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya. 2015. № 6 (26). S. 1–11.
  16. Intellektualnaya sistema tematicheskogo issledovaniya nauchno-tehnicheskoy informacii (ISTINA) / V.A. Vasenin [i dr.] // Informacionnoe obschestvo. 2013. № 1–2. S. 39–57.
  17. Intellektualnaya sistema tematicheskogo issledovaniya nauchno-tehnicheskoy informacii (ISTINA) / S.A. Afonin [i dr.]; pod red. V.A. Sadovnichego. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. 262 s. URL: https://istina.msu.ru/media/publications/book/4cd/546/7375366/Istina-book.pdf (data obrascheniya 09.04.2019).
  18. Jeffery K. G. The new technologies: can CRISs benefit? In: CRIS2004: 7th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Antwerp, May 13–15, 2004, pp. 77–87. Available at: http://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/311 (accessed 08.04.2019).
  19. Bailo D., Jeffery K.G. EPOS: a novel use of CERIF for data intensive science. In: CRIS2014: 12th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Rome, May 13–15, 2014, pp. 1–8. Available at: http://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/185 (accessed 08.04.2019).
  20. Schöpfel J., Prost H., Rebouillat V. Research Data in Current Research Information Systems. In: CRIS2016: 13th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, Scotland, UK, June 9–11, 2016, pp. 1–21. Available at: https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_01331537/document (accessed 08.04.2019).
  21. De Castro P. The role of Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) in supporting Open Science implementation: the case of Strathclyde. ITlib. Informačné technológie a knižnice, spec. iss., 2018, pp. 21–30. Available at: https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/bitstream/11366/691/7/PDeCastro_Role_of_Current_Research_Information_Systems.pdf (accessed 08.04.2019).
  22. Research information systems at universities and research institutions. Position paper. DINI AG Research Information Systems (AG-FIS), vers. 1.0, 2015. 33 p. Available at: https://dini.de/fileadmin/docs/AG_Positionspapier_engl_final.pdf (accessed 09.04.2019).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: